World

Zimbabwean ex-domestic worker set to inherit mansion in Capetown SA

CAPE TOWN Jane Bwanya, a former domestic worker who was “swept off her feet” six years ago by a relatively wealthy businessman, has succeeded in changing the provisions of South Africa’s Intestate Succession Act, which had barred unmarried partners in a he_teros__exual union from inheriting.

She now stands to inherit the estate of her life partner, Anthony Ruch, which includes a guest house in Camps Bay and a flat in Sea Point.

Only Bwanya and a chauffeur laid claim to the estate, which was being administered by the Masters office because Ruch died, leaving his estate to his mother, who was already dead.

Both claims were rejected. Bwanya went to court.

In a recent judgement, Western Cape High Court acting judge Penelope Magona ruled that the Act was unconstitutional in that while it catered for married and same-s_x couples, it did not provide for those in Bwanya’s situation.

Judge Magona also ruled that certain sections of the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act were unconstitutional.

Evidence before the court was that the couple met in February 2014, while Bwanya was waiting for a taxi in Camps Bay to take her to Cape Town station to send goods to her family in Zimbabwe.

Ruch took her to the train station and they went on their first date that evening. They spent progressively more time together and soon engaged in a relationship. Four months after the first meeting, she moved in with him. They alternated between the flat and the guest house.

She always maintained her room at the premises where she worked, in case she had to work late. Two of Ruch’s friends supported her application, describing how the couple were always together and that he “treated her like a princess”.

It was a permanent life partnership, Bwanya said. He was helping her get her driver’s licence, and they intended starting a cleaning business. They were in the process of organising a trip to Zimbabwe so that he could pay lobola when he died unexpectedly in April 2016, aged 57.

He had never married and he had no surviving relatives.

The judge said the Act excluded life partners in permanent opposite-s_x life partnerships from inheriting, as did the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act, which specifically defined “survivor”, “spouse”, and “marriage”.

The Women’s Legal Centre and the Commission for Gender Equality were admitted as amici curiae “acting in the interests of a group or class of people as well as in the public interest”.

Source – Ground Up

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Close
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker