Ruby Karyo, a 30-year-old mom, has an unconventional secret for great skin: urine therapy. She’s been practicing it for 11 years, even applying urine on her face as part of her daily beauty regimen. Her dad introduced her to this peculiar practice, suggesting that it could make her a “beauty queen.”
Every morning, Ruby rubs her morning pee onto her face, using it like a moisturizer, leaving it on for hours or all day. She drinks her own urine twice a week and sprays it on her face daily, claiming that it’s improved her skin, healed scars and pimples, and even made her feel and look younger.
Ruby’s belief in urine therapy is so strong that she’s convinced her boyfriend to give it a try too, claiming that it’s helped him regrow his hair in just two months. While it might seem unusual to some, Ruby is determined to spread the word about the surprising benefits she’s experienced firsthand.
Can Humans Trust Robots More if They Appear More Human-Like?
Exploring Human Trust in Robots: The Role of Eye Gaze
A recent study delves into the intriguing question of whether humans can trust robots more if they appear more human-like. The findings provide insights into the dynamics of human-robot collaboration and challenge conventional assumptions.
Join 'Mzansi Trending' on WhatsApp "Mzansi Trending" keeps you in the know about the hottest entertainment news in South Africa. From celebrity gossip to the latest soapie releases!
🌍🌟 Yoin our channel for daily updates on what's trending and make sure you never miss a beat in the world of South African entertainment. 🇿🇦🌟 🚀
The Importance of Robot Eyes
The question at the heart of this study was whether the presence of eyes on robots, mimicking human-like gaze, influences the level of trust humans place in these machines when collaborating with them.
Cobots and Anthropomorphic Design
The study centered on “cobots,” collaborative robots designed to assist humans in various tasks, ranging from industrial to medical applications. Some of these cobots are equipped with eyes and designed to resemble humans to a certain extent, with the belief that this anthropomorphic appearance might ensure the naturalness of their interactions with humans.
To investigate this, Artur Pilacinski and his team of researchers at the Ruhr University Bochum in Germany, the University of Coimbra, and the University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, both in Portugal conducted experiments with 38 participants aged between 18 and 42.
They employed subjective and objective measures, including heart rate, pupil size, and task completion time, to assess human trust levels when collaborating with eyed and non-eyed robots of the same type.
The results, outlined in the study titled “The robot eyes don’t have it. The presence of eyes on collaborative robots yields marginally higher user trust but lower performance,” challenge conventional assumptions. Although participants expressed slightly greater trust in robots fitted with eyes, their performance revealed a contrasting narrative. When collaborating with robots lacking eyes, participants demonstrated enhanced task efficiency and exhibited larger pupil sizes, potentially reflecting heightened engagement with the task.
These results imply that humans may not inherently demand human-like attributes in robots to establish trust and productive collaboration. Instead, the data suggest that individuals may find it more comfortable to cooperate with robots with machine-like characteristics that do not mimic human eyes.
The Role of Anthropomorphism
In a statement, Artur Pilacinski noted that “the cobot’s gaze may not be that important for manual collaboration.” This research aligns with emerging suggestions that anthropomorphism, or the tendency to attribute human characteristics to non-human entities like robots, may not always be beneficial for collaborative robots.
Balancing Subjective and Objective Trust
The study highlights the complex interplay between objective and subjective markers of trust in human interactions with artificial agents. In essence, the presence of human-like eyes on robots may marginally increase subjective trust, but it can come at the cost of reduced task performance and comfort in collaboration.
This study encourages a reevaluation of the role of anthropomorphism in the design and deployment of collaborative robots, emphasizing the importance of objective measures in assessing human-robot interactions.
“We found that while collaboration with eyed cobots resulted in slightly higher subjective trust ratings, the objective markers such as pupil size and task completion time indicated it was, in fact, less comfortable to collaborate with eyed robots,” the researchers wrote.